Criminal Complaint Victim Witness Statement: [9] Desrepancies in "The Reasons of Judgment of Justice Horner" Verus Evidence

Paragraph 3 states; "RRSPs investments and cash on hand at the time of separation."

RRSPs is RRSP. It is not RRSPs. It should singular not Pural. Mr. Achtem has never owned an RRSP in life ever. However Ms. Achtem was the only party that had an RRSP which was entered into evidence on page

Table of Contents

Memorandum; to
Chief Justices of Alberta of the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta and Court of Appeal of Alberta, & Chief of Calgary Police ServiceJoint Complaint; Criminal Complaint to Police Court Complaint to Chief Justices because the court breached the Functus Officio Doctrine and Separation of Powers Principal, defacto courts' Judgments lawlessly aggregated an over 80 percent split of matrimonial to the Defendant my ex-wife Rhonda Sails, now the Accused from a divorce coming from a 14 year marriage with zero $0.00 exemptions. The Plaintiff Victim Edward Achtem is forced to pay too high child support since 2008 withOUT remedy to have it reduced, due to the February 1st of Justice Miller. The Hearing is Ascending from sanctioned offenses purported at Trial by the Accused.
the Victim is requesting remedy and police action..................A1
___________________________________________________

Written Presentation:
from; Christopher Wingate, Perth, West Australia, Australia“Law Management”
Functus Officio................................................................B1 to B4
___________________________________________________

Table of Authorities.................................................................B5
___________________________________________________
AFFIDAVIT Victim-Witness Statement of Edward Darren Achtem (Paragraphs 1 to 137):

- [1] Introduction child support and court sanctioned crime issues, paragraphs 1 to 30

--- 2nd Family's Income paragraphs 5 to 10.

--- 1st Child's Child Support Adjustments proposed for 2008
to present, paragraphs 11 to 15.

- [2] Part I: The Trial Judge Sanctioned Rhonda Achtem's Offenses paragraphs 31 to 92.

-- Analysis of the Witness Box Attack Broken down
into 2 Climaxes paragraphs 55 to 83.

--- 1st Climax - When and after Ms. Achtem presented her
undisclosed 2nd Bundle of Documents; and cross-examination
of her exhibit A; paragraphs 55 to 66.

---2nd Climax paragraphs Ms. Achtem's cross-examination
of Edward Achtem paragraphs 67 to 83.

-[3] Part II: Monetary Elements of Sanctioned Fraud, Analysis
of Division of Matrimonial as a Result of Defacto Court's
Reasons for Judgment of Justice Horner, paragraphs 91 to 132.

- [4] Statement of Questions in Issue paragraph 133.

- [5] Argument paragraphs 134 and 135.

- [6] Conclusion paragraphs 136 and 137.

Federal Court Order and Judgments and 77 EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT A: Federal Court Order of Prothonotary
Lafreniener January 17, 2011..........................................page D1

EXHIBIT B: Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) Judgment
December 11, 2008..........................................................page D7

EXHIBIT C: Court of Appeal of Alberta Memorandum
of Judgment May 17, 2008..............................................page D8

EXHIBIT D: In The Court of Queen's Bench of
Alberta Judicial District of Medicine Hat Reasons
for Judgment of JusticeHorner July 13, 2007...............page D12

Transcript Portions and Suppelment Audio Segment:
EXHIBIT T - Transcript portions: Pre-trial pages 34 to 38, Trial pages 94 to 97, 108 to 125, 154, 155, and 159 to 161.

EXHIBIT TA: Supplement EXHIBIT Trial Audio of Rhonda Achtem's Cross-examination of E. Achtem, time: 11:29:50 a.m. to 12:03:09 a.m. May 17, 2007 COPY of prepared by Alberta Justice TMS Regional, Red Deer Alberta...Disk or click here.
Note: (use Windows Play to play FTR segment)

Supporting Documents:
EXHIBIT 1: Order of Justice Miller,
February 1, 2008......................................................................E1

EXHIBIT 2: Order of Justice Hughes,
May 6, 2006.............................................................................E4

EXHIBIT 3: Order of Justice Sulatycky,
March 9, 2009.........................................................................E7

"Current child support, access and custody Order"
EXHIBIT 4: Order of Justice Hembroff,
December 24, 2004.................................................................E9

EXHIBIT 5: Certificate of Divorce,
January 17, 2007....................................................................E10

EXHIBIT 6: Edward D. Achtem's Notice
of Assessments 2010,2009, and 2008...................................E11

EXHIBIT 7: Edward D. Achtem's Pay stubs
June, July and August 2011...................................................E13

EXHIBIT 8: Maintenance Enforcement Program
MEP Statements of Arrears...................................................E14

EXHIBIT 9: 2nd wife's income
for 2009, 2008, and 2007 is $0............................................E19

EXHIBIT 10: 2nd wife's 2010 income is
$1,300.00 per month (part-time employment)....................E20

EXHIBIT 11: 2nd wife's last 3 months pay stubs
(part-time employment)........................................................E21

EXHIBIT 12: 2nd child's birth certificate..............................E23

EXHIBIT 13: 2nd child's money
from birth to present................................................E24 to E29a

EXHIBIT 14: Doctor Lopez's prescription............................E30

EXHIBIT 15: Doucet‑Boudreau v. Nova Scotia
(Minister of Education), [2003] 3 S.C.R. 3,
2003 SCC 6............................................................................E31

EXHIBIT 16: Order of Justice Rawlins,
March 29, 2007.....................................................................E69

EXHIBIT 17: Pre-trail Court Notes,
March 29, 2007.....................................................................E71

EXHIBIT 18: Kathleen Linton's legal opinion
for Legal Aid..........................................................................E72

EXHIBIT 19A: copies of pages 2 and 3 of
defacto appellant's court Memorandum of
Judgment, with the fictions or perjuries
underlined in red...................................................................E76

EXHIBIT 19B: complete copy of defacto court's
Reasons for Judgment of Justice Horner, with
what is contrary underlined in red........................................E78

EXHIBIT 20: R v Kusk 1999 ABCA 49 (CanLII)..................E87

EXHIBIT 21: Rhonda Achtem's 1st List of
Exhibits, notice of intentions................................................E92

EXHIBIT 22: Rhonda Achtem's
2nd List of Exhibits...............................................................E93

EXHIBIT 23: Edward Achtem's Medical Documents
grouped together......................................................E94 to E101

EXHIBIT 24: Ms. Sails's (Achtem) letter
to the Court of Appeal of Alberta,
September 12, 2007.............................................................E102

EXHIBIT 25A: deleted transcript, no Pre-trail
Order exists, Pre-trial Order recoverered
and Mr. Wachowich's letter.................................E104 to E109b

EXHIBIT 25B: QB Civil practice Note 5,
Family Law Pre-trial Conferences.....................................E109c

EXHIBIT 26: Appellant's Factum
of Edward D. Darren Achtem.............................................E110

EXHIBIT 27A: Ms. Achtem's exhibit M,
e-mail received March 20, 2006; 6:46 p.m.
from E. Achtem to Les Scholly...........................................E118

EXHIBIT 27B: Correct Answers to cross-
examination of Ms. Achtem exhibit M..............................E119

EXHIBIT 28A: Ms. Achtem's exhibit N,e-mail
Ms. Achtem received September 4, 2003;
8:27 a.m from Edward D. Achtem....................................E122

EXHIBIT 28B: Correct Answers to cross-examination
of Ms. Achtem's exhibit N..................................................E123

EXHIBIT 29A: Ms. Achtem's exhibit O, e-mail
Ms. Achtem received October 3, 2003;
7:37 a.m. from Edward D. Achtem....................................E125

EXHIBIT 29B: Correct Answers to cross-examination of Ms. Achtem's exhibit N........E126

EXHIBIT 30A: Ms. Achtem's exhibit P, e-mail
Ms. Achtem sent November 17, 2003; 4:03 p.m.
to Edward D. Achtem........................................................E129

EXHIBIT 30B: Correct Answers to cross-examination
of Ms. Achtem's exhibit P..................................................E131

EXHIBIT 31A: Ms. Achtem's exhibit Q, e-mail
Ms. Achtem received November 19, 2003;
9:09 a.m. from Edward D. Achtem...................................E133

EXHIBIT 31B: Correct Answers to cross-examination
of Ms. Achtem's exhibit Q.................................................E134

EXHIBIT 32A: Ms. Achtem's exhibit R, e-mail
Ms. Achtem received July 9, 2004; 2:48:30 a.m.
from Edward D. Achtem....................................................E137

EXHIBIT 32B: Correct Answers to cross-examination
of Ms. Achtem's exhibit R..................................................E138

EXHIBIT 33: Order of Justice Wilkins
July 31, 2008......................................................................E141

EXHIBIT 34: Part I and II of Ms. Achtem's
Supreme Court of Canada Response.................................E144

EXHIBIT 35: Letter CMA accountant R Allen
wrote to Supreme Court of Canada....................................E151

EXHIBIT 36: Statement of Division
of Assets Since Separation.................................................E152

EXHIBIT 37: Adjusted Sheet, Statement of
Division of Matrimonial Assets and Liabilities
Since Separation, September 6, 2011................................E155

EXHIBIT 38: June 22, 2003 Medicine Hat home
Real Estate Purchase Agreement......................................E157

EXHIBIT 39: Calgary home Real Estate
Purchase Agreement.........................................................E161

EXHIBIT 40: July 24, 2003 Investment
Property Information Calgary home purchase................E165

EXHIBIT 41: July 30, 2003 Re: Sale
to MACKENZIE................................................................E168

EXHIBIT 42: August 8, 2003 ATB Loan
Agreement Calgary home purchase.................................E173

EXHIBIT 43: Land Title Certificate
Calgary home....................................................................E175

EXHIBIT 44: Land Title Certificate
Medicine Hat Home.........................................................E178

EXHIBIT 45: Edward Achtem's July and
August 2003 Canada Trust bank Account
Statement.........................................................................E180

EXHIBIT 46: The Achtem's joint ATB
bank account statements August 23 2003......................E182

EXHIBIT 47: The Achtem's August 7, 2003
joint ATB MasterCard Statement....................................E184

EXHIBIT 48: Edward Achtem's July 12, 2003
to August 12, 2003 TD Visa Statement............................E185

EXHIBIT 49: Hatfax Laser Products July and
August 2003 Bank Statements.........................................E186

EXHIBIT 50: January 4, 2004, ATB Financial
Delinquent Payment Notice.............................................E190

EXHIBIT 51: 3 Letters from Litwiniuk and
Company February 27 to March 2, 2004; for
sale of the Calgary home...................................................E191

EXHIBIT 52: 2 Letters with sales information
from Litwiniuk & Company
April 8 and 12, 2004...........................................E194 to E204

EXHIBIT 53: Mr. Achtem's income for 2003,
2004, and 2005 Notice of Assessment............................E205

EXHIBIT 54: Ms. Achtem's CIBC bank statement,
November 6, 2003............................................................E208

EXHIBIT 55: March 26, 2004 Rhonda Achtem's
Sun Life RRSP...................................................................E210

EXHIBIT 56: March 26, 2004 Rhonda Achtem's
Canada Savings Bond........................................................E211

EXHIBIT 57: March 3, 2004 Ms. Achtem Payment
of (-$2,571.69) to the Achtem's
Joint ATB MasterCard......................................................E212

EXHIBIT 58: February 11,2007 Statement of
arrears from Edward Achtem parents..............................E213

EXHIBIT 59: Rhonda Achtem's November 14,
2003 CIBC Visa Statement...............................................E215

EXHIBIT 60: Canada Customs Business Arrears,
for GST for `02 & `03's (EST)..........................................E216

EXHIBIT 61: Ambulance Bill October 2003....................E217

EXHIBIT 62: City of Calgary
snow removal bill..............................................................E218

EXHIBIT 63: Calgary home ATCO Gas bill
March 30, 2004.................................................................E219

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

[01] Sections 1, 6(1), 6(1)(b), 7, 12, 14, 15.(1), 15.(2), 24.(1), 24.(2), of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
[02] Alberta Justice Minister and Attorney General - Mandate [03] Sections 63.(1), 64, 65.(2)(b) to (d) PART II Judges Act
[04] Sections 6(1), 6(2), 28(1), and 28(2) Canada Evidence Act [05] Alberta Rule of Court 158.5(1)(e)
[06] Paragraphs 122, 126(1)(2), 362(1)(c), 380(a), 463(a) of the Criminal Code of Canada

Case Law:
[1] Dahlseide v. Dahlseide, 2008 ABCA 429 (CanLII) — 2008-12-17 Court of Appeal — Alberta
[2] Ambrozic v. Burcevski, 2008 ABCA 194 (CanLII) — 2008-05-22 - Court of Appeal — Alberta
[3] Citation: Conway v. Zinkhofer, 2008 ABCA 392. Date: (2008-11-20............Court of Appeal of Alberta
[4] Cosgrove v. Canadian Judicial Council, 2005 FC 1454 (CanLII)
Date: 2005-10-26
Docket: T-101-05
Parallel citations: 261 D.L.R. (4th) 447 • 40 Admin. L.R. (4th) 1 • 282 F.T.R. 60
URL: http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/fct/doc/2005/2005fc1454/2005fc1454.html
[5] Doucet-Boudreau v. Nova Scotia (Minister of Education), 2003 SCC 62, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 3
Date: 2003-11-06 Docket: 28807
Parallel citations: 2003 SCC 62 (CanLII) • 218 N.S.R.(2d) 311 • 232 D.L.R. (4th) 577 • 112 C.R.R. (2d) 202
[6] Khamo v. Daved, 1998 ABQB 832 (CanLII) — 1998-10-14
[7] Naistus v. Huculak, 1998 ABQB 263 (CanLII) — 1998-04-15)
[8] R. v. H. (E.F.) 1997 CanLII 418 (ON C.A.), (1997), 115 C.C.C. (3d) 89 (Ont. C.A.)
[9] Chandler v. Alberta Association of Architects, 1989 CanLII 41 (S.C.C.), [1989] 2 S.C.R 848
[10] Grillas v. Minister of Manpower and Immigration, 1971 CanLII 3 (S.C.C.), [1972] S.C.R. 577
[11] Paper Machinery Ltd. v. J. O. Ross Engineering Corp., 1934 CanLII 1 (S.C.C.), [1934] S.C.R. 186).
[12] In re St. Nazaire Co. (1879), 12 Ch. D. 88.
[13] In re Swire (1885), 30 Ch. D. 239.

INVESTIGATIVE Reporter Producer and Host of On Second Thought TV

VALUABLE EDUCATION MATERIAL

Great for those training or who want to be $$judicial/public sector crime private sector investigators$$? Or Maybe you have a deep personal issue where judges was sticking his/her noses into places where it does not belong? Thus perporting to have exceeding their durisdiction. Thus throwing off the course of justice sending courts into disrepute. Do ya wanna bust kangaroos? Then watch all the public sector crooks and LawLIARs pop out like rabbits?

ON SECOND THOUGHT TV's YOU TUBE Channel; http://www.youtube.com/user/williamwagener

- On Second Thought's - Home Blog -
Please visit my other BLOGs below:
[01] Michael Jackson Super Hero Super Star
[02] Taxation WithOUT Representation - Warnken & Wagener
[03] Free Attorney Richard Fine On Second Thought TV
[04] American SuperHero G.I. Julie On Second Thought Is He a P E D O F I L E?
[05] Canadian Rape and Injustice For All Blog by, Eddie Achtem Calgary, Alberta, Canada
[06] COPPER CARDS THE SERIES - Clive Boustred ON SECOND THOUGHT
REAL AMERICAN SUPER HERO ROGER WEIDNER!
[07] Roger Weidner On Second Thought TV Blog
[08] Dr. Orly Teitz On Second Thought Television
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LEGAL EXPERT & RESEARCHER

CHRISTOPHER WINGATE

Click here to Visit Chistopher Wingate's
"Law Management" BLOG
Bio: Christopher Wingate
Married 25 years, 4 wonderful kids.Self made millionaire by 25. Lived in Aust NZ Vancouver and Hawaii.In 1997 I funded Auckland school kid Scott Dixon to race Formula Holden then the following year I set up Scott Dixon Motorsport to fund Scott's racing career.In 2003 Dixon won the Indy Racing world title in his first attempt and then in 2008 won the Indy 500 and the Indy World Title. In 1999 shipped a 4wd to India and drove to London with Sir Peter Tapsell and Prof Frank Brosnahan via India,Pakistan, Iran, Syria Jordon, Lebanon,Turkey etc.30 Years in business all over the world. Spent $5.5m on litigation over the Matakana Island theft by a politically connected bank. Won the 4 week trial, and retrial apl but got totally screwed by Appeal Courts who changed the facts in order to give the land to Maori who claimed it was sacred -but they sold the lot to property developers for $75m. I have spent thousands of hours in my career dealing with politicians, lawyers, red tape and idiots in power. This has led me to campaign for the removal of Crown and Judicial Immunity. We are currently filming a movie called The Fiduciary Disguise, a 9/11 type film about government power.
See Christopher Wingate on Functus Officio

Death to Kangaroo Court?

Only time will tell if public sector crooks have turned a new leaf

Artical from the Calgary Herald September 12, 2010 click to view

Public Sector Crook Alberta Culture Minister Lindsay Blackett.Photograph by: Archive, Calgary HeraldThe Alberta government will soon announce a new director for the Alberta Human Rights Commission, completing an overhaul of the quasi-judicial body that has been nearly two years in the making. It will be a long-awaited but welcome change spurred in part by a critical report early in 2009 that called for reforms. (BULLPUCKY!)

Alberta Culture Minister Lindsay Blackett, who was instrumental in pushing for the change, recently told the Herald's editorial board that the commission is being retooled from top to bottom so that there will be "no more kangaroo courts." For too long, human rights tribunals have operated outside the normal rules of evidence that apply to regular court proceedings, leading to allegations that they are often unfair and lacking in due process, especially in controversial areas such as free speech.

"We had to change the governance of how it's run," Blackett said. "It has to be objective. It's a quasi-judicial body that has to be run like one."

Last year, the province announced the appointment of Blair Mason, with 25 years experience on the federal court, to head the commission. "We had to get a judge to . . . put some discipline in it," said Blackett.

As chief commissioner, Mason will run tribunal hearings into unresolved cases. The soon-to-be-named director -- a person Blackett says is of "top notch quality" -- will run the nuts and bolts of the commission's daily work, where the bulk of cases are resolved. Of 668 files handled in 2008-2009, only 22 cases, or three per cent, went to a tribunal hearing.

As someone with judicial experience, Mason should bring some credibility to tribunal rulings. The many flaws in the existing process were exposed in a Dec. 3, 2009, ruling by Alberta Court of Queen's Bench Justice Earl Wilson that overturned an Alberta human rights tribunal finding against Red Deer youth pastor Stephen Boissoin.

Boissoin was found guilty and fined after making disparaging remarks about homosexuals in a letter to the Red Deer Advocate eight years ago.

Wilson ruled that the tribunal overstepped its constitutional bounds and took significant procedural liberties that would have never been permitted in a real court.

Blackett says the new human rights commission will be streamlined so that decisions are made within the 190-day average of the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench. Some commission rulings have taken longer than 400 days.

If the system works as Blackett says, Alberta will be at the forefront of implementing an efficient commission with a credible tribunal process.

In Saskatchewan, the latter is so broken that the government is considering scrapping tribunals altogether and sending unresolved commission cases directly to courts, where they often end up anyway, on appeal.

We have applauded this bold approach, but are willing to give Alberta's re-tooled process one last try.

If the system works as Alberta Culture Minister Lindsay Blac ket Sa ys, Alberta wil be at the forefro nt of implementing an efficient co mmissio n wit ha credible tribunal process.

© Copyright (c) The Calgary Herald

Alberta Culture Minister Lindsay Blackett.

Photograph by: Archive, Calgary Herald •E-mail this Gallery•Print this Gallery•Share this Gallery Photo Galleries »

http://www.calgaryherald.com/opinion/Death+kangaroo+court/3512763/story.html?cid=megadrop_story#ixzz10DWBGDB8

Criminal Complaint Victim Witness Statement

[9] Desrepancies in "The Reasons of Judgment of Justice Horner" Verus Evidence

No comments:

Total Pageviews

About Me

Table of Contents

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

Alleged LawLIARs Lies Have Genuine Integrity

INVESTIGATIVE Reporter Producer and Host of On Second Thought TV

The Big Picture of Truth

Death to Kangaroo Court?

Labels