The Justice Minister of Alberta Mandate and Arbitrary Duty to the Judges Act

The Justice Minister of Alberta Mandate and Arbitrary Duty to the Judges Act:

Institution: Alberta Ministry of Justice and Attorney General More Details
Organization: Alberta Justice Communications
Last Revised: 2009-12-21

Justice and Attorney General - Mandate
The mission of Alberta Justice and Attorney General is to protect the rights of all individuals in Alberta and advance the interests of society by fostering: safe communities; access to justice; respect for the law; understanding of and confidence in the justice system, and the legal foundation for social cohesion and economic prosperity.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 63.(1) of Part II - The Judges Act; states; [The Justice Ministers of the provinces's Arbitrary Duty to Instruct the Canadian Judicial Coucil to proceed with a Judicial Inquiry]
Inquiries concerning Judges
Inquiries
63.(1) The Council shall, at the request of the Minister or the attorney general of a province, commence an inquiry as to whether a judge of a superior court or of the Tax Court of Canada should be removed from office for any of the reasons set out in paragraphs 65(2)(a) to (d).

Report and Recommendations
Report of Council 65.
Recommendation to Minister
65.(2) Where, in the opinion of the Council, the judge in respect of whom an inquiry or investigation has been made has become incapacitated or disabled from the due execution of the office of judge by reason of
(b) having been guilty of misconduct,
(c) having failed in the due execution of that office, or

[1]

1

[6]

6

[7]

7

[8]

8

[9] Desrepancies in "The Reasons of Judgment of Justice Horner" Verus Evidence

Paragraph 3 states; "RRSPs investments and cash on hand at the time of separation."

RRSPs is RRSP. It is not RRSPs. It should singular not Pural. Mr. Achtem has never owned an RRSP in life ever. However Ms. Achtem was the only party that had an RRSP which was entered into evidence on page

[11]

11

[13] For Future Posting

[14] unsorted jury trial dialogue

At Trial Ms. Sails knew everything about Mr. Achtem and she knew Mr. Achtem better than anyone. She was with him for more than 14 yerars. She knew how to attack his disabilty of short-term memory function better than anyone at the time of Trial. Mr. Achtem has suffered from MS ever since he woke up the morning of November 11, 1998 next to his wife Ms. Sails, and Mr. Achtem's head felt like a horse kick him in the head. So Ms. Sails did get to watch Mr. Achtem's disease progress from that point onward. For which later she did not want him anymore because MS hindered Mr. Achtem's employability, his lacking physical and sexual proformance. Mr. Achtem's short-term memory caused by MS that constantly joggs his conversation abilities over things that have not been registered in his long-term memory function which is well intact. Mr. Achtem and Ms. Sails both knew his long-term memory is enhance because Mr. Achtem does not forget alot if he has reviewed and reviewed again and again and again. When it's new material then Mr. Achtem will need the time to become well versed on it. Ms. Sails who knew how to attack Mr. Achtem's memory better than anyone decided to attack him with old e-mails as rigged Exhbits yo fool Mr. Achtem, and boy did she ever make him feel like a fool for which he did NOT deserve it. He had no access to the e-mail because his computer crashed, and how anyone and Mr. Achtem who sends hundreds of e-mails every month, going to remember old 2.5 year old e-mails. During the time of first 4 months of separation Mr. Achtem and most men do send hundreds to their separated wife that they still love and out of dispare they send numerous e-mails. Mr. Achtem did this just because he wanted to reconcile his marriage with Ms. Sails and to be with his daughter for which Ms. Achtem FRAUD and judges eye balling up the fact that Mr. Achtem want to use some of the proceed of his matrimonial to help with paying for suppervised visits with my daughter. It was Justice Rawlins from Pre-trial who was eye balling up the fact that Mr. Achtem wanted to use funds from the proceeds of his matrimonial.