[02]

Time has revealed, too many judges are public sector crooks who enjoy being "Sexist-Chivalist" (both male and female judges).  The are some members from the "Boy's Cub" corrupted the system through tradition.  We are lucky to live in this fine Country that has fine fine laws, a charter, and a Consitution.

If Mr. Achtem could go back to the year 2003 to warn himself of what was to come the years follow the day Mrs. Sails and Mr. Achtem stopped cohabitting togther on July 23, 2003.  Mr. Achtem grew up in a finer Edmonton neighborhood.  His Father Edward Achtem Sr. was a lawyer for many years who only took on cases were divorces/separation were uncontested, and when Edward Achtem Sr. had individual looking for a lawyer to go to court and fight.  Then Edward Sr. in most case those who aproached him seeking court action.  During the time Edward Sr. practiced he earned a reputation of persuading most of those who working seeking court room divorce action.  Edward Sr. has save more marriages than most Lawyers are doing water to make their clients pay more be causing themselve to created more time to bill. 

Because Albert Einstein said; "The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who will not do anything about it"  Somehow society has become indoctinated to not care about non-custodial parents who stuggle to remain in the childrens lives that vintictive ex-spouses like Mrs. Sails, who will do anything to prevented.  Her daughers from having her father in her life, just because she a woman scorned who feels Mr. Achtem s This Mr. Achtem is a member of a small minority group called; the "non-custodial parents's group".  Mrs. Sails and some individuals, and Canadian Federal appointed judge had collective Goal setout before them to carry out the devils work to make it impossible for the daughter of the marriage to have her father mr. Achtem in her life was a collective  collective goal  has even driven  those deprived of Justice, as a form of history repeats tradition.  Society has

[still need to be completed and a an edit]

[08] Victim/Witness STATEMENT - Jury Presentation SCRIPT

Blog UNDER MASS CONSTRUCTION
;
[Fed app Statement of Claim - Delayed]
***Motion Expected to be PENDING by Tuesday July 1, 2010***
(Rentry QB app delayed due to new evidence) [Everything delayed until atleast July 20,2010]

(1)----- It is ALLEGED, on or before the 17th day, of May, 2007 A.D. Prior to, at, and after attending Trial. In the Province of Alberta in city of Medicine Hat at Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta it is the applicant's position that Rhonda Rose Sails is purported to have committed offences paragraphs 380(a), 362(1)(c) of the Criminal Code of Canada by Preparing and producing documents that may have obstructed the course of justice, and thusly brought the honourable court into disrepute. It shall be advanced, and evidenced that she planned and committed the act of false pretense, ultimately leading to the alleged FRAUD. She sneaked past the Bench tactfully arranged Exhibits that deceived the Plaintiff, Edward Darren Achtem who was attacked in the Witness Box. Ms. Sails presented a new "2nd Bundle of Documents" with the corresponding ["2nd List of Exhibits" EXHIBIT #2] into Trial which started at 11:30 a.m. Ms. Sails's (Achtem) requested if she may present Exhibits while Mr. Achtem was still in the Witness Box, which was not expected. Because prior to Pre-trial Ms. Sails's (Achtem) filed a ["1st List of Exhibits" - EXHIBIT #1] which outlines the contents of the "1st Bundle of Documents", and she provided Mr. Achtem with copies of the her Exhibits which was the "1st Bundle of Documents".

(2)----- Ms. Sails (Achtem) failed to prepare Mr. Achtem for her surprise of [Exhibits M, N, O, P, Q, and R. - EXHIBIT #3] . If Ms. Achtem had provided Mr. Achtem with reasonable intent like no later than 7 days as the Canada Evidence Act states. Then Mr. Achtem would have been able to answer Ms. Sails's (Achtem) Cross-examination of Exhibit M to R much differently than he did at Trial. Lets view and examine in great detail [EXHIBIT #4 - Comparison List of Correct Answers - verus - Answers at Trial to Exhibits M to R] Further to Ms. Sails's unexpected surprise "2nd Bundle of Documents", she only informed Mr. Achtem of her intent that she was going to use Exhibits A, B, E, J, and K. For which her Exhibits C, D, E, G, H, I, J, K, and L Ms. Achtem did NOT inform him of her intent either as the law states she has to. however they have been produced into the case earlier by either of them. They are based on numbers facts and figures and shows were some portions of matrimonial of where it went.

[For internet users only click here instead having to perform a Vulcan Mind Meld with my case Just Like Spock had to do with the creature that tunnelled bellow the planet. She was steam rolling over people because of some confused humans who invaded her planet. Seeing the video will save you from having to do a Vulcan Mind Meld with my case.]

(3)----- Mr. Achtem is not arguing the facts on these Exhibits, but it just for the fundamental fact that Ms. Achtem was to have prepared Mr. Achtem for whatever Exhibits he had to answer to. So no Mr. Achtem is not going to argue with numbers, because properly tabulated numbers CANNOT lie like people can. like for example how the 3-judge panel came up with 13 fictions. on their Memorandum of Judgment pretty much did this. They looked each other in confusion, gave their heads a shake in confusion because they were just as confused as Mr. Achtem was throughout from the time Ms. Achtem pulled a trick out of her sleeve up until the legal process became exhausted in the Supreme Court of Canada. Mr. Achtem's impression is The 3-judge panel just must have colluded horribly some how to the point they all agreed like this. "oh well let's just wing it", thus producing a fictional "Memorandum of Judgment". Mr. Achtem is going to lay it all out for you on day 3, and hopefully not having do it on day 4 as I plan to have my opening argument all wrapped up by Thursday at 2:30, then giving the floor to the Defence on Friday.

(4)-----Let Mr. Achtem present to you on the overhead projector a comparison. To compare Ms. Sail's's ["1st List of Exhibits". Which was the List of Exhibits for which is the list of what documents that Ms. Sails sent to Mr. Achtem informing him. Of What documents she was to use at Trial. Which is the list of what documents Ms. Achtem did prepare for Mr. Achtem informing him of what documents she was to use for cross examination]- versus - [Ms. Sail's's ["2st List of Exhibits". Which was Not a List of Exhibits for which is the list of what documents that Ms. Sails sent to Mr. Achtem informing him. Of What documents she was NOT to use 8 Exhibits at Trial. Which is NOT the list of the exact same documents containing the same Exhibits as the one's Ms. Achtem did Prepare Mr. Achtem for cross examination]

(5)----- Mr. Achtem requests permission to provide the Jurors each and the judge with a scape copy of Exhibit 1 and 2. And a YELLOW high-lighter pen. for the Jurors and the judge to follow Mr. Achtem as he continues with presenting the comparison difference between the 2 exhibits. (EST time - 8 minutes, then continue on)

(6)----- Depending on how long the Defence takes good chance you be done Friday, go home for the weekend relax and think. Then maybe good chance you'll be back hope on Monday and you'll all decide a Verdict.

(7)----- If Justice Horner had been an excellent judge that had not let herself become led into malfeasance by Ms. Sails, then this may have been prevented. If Justice Horner had permitted Mr. Achtem time to examine Ms. Sails's Exhibits before having to answer to them. Then maybe Mr. Achtem could have prevented this too, thus exposing the fraudster's. Then maybe Mr. Achtem could have explained or objected to Ms. Sails's FRAUD, that threw off the course of Justice, indeed. Then maybe Mr. Achtem would have not been home ownerless crawling out of the pit of poverty that Ms. Sails with the help of Justice Karen Horner together, threw him and his 2nd family into. But Justice Horner choose to NOT provide Mr. Achtem that opportunity. Justice did not want Mr. Achtem knowing anything about Ms. Sails's Exhibits before having to answer to them. Justice Horner could have been an Excellent Judge who could have done the best thing by seeing through the Fraudster's Fraud and saying to Ms. Achtem (Sails) you're busted. But No! Justice Karen Horner was not the best judge. She was not the best judge who could have prevented this complicated web of circiumstanses from happening. She was a rather careless accessory to Ms. Sails's act of FRAUD Under The Colour of Law as you will all see explicitly throughout this jury presentation. Mr. Achtem is just one of many individuals who was singled out by a female biassed female judge who started her career, being trained by the due to a tyrannical bias non custodial parents legal system it is. But it's not any system it is because of human and also because the Defendant is a Fraudster, the Trial Judge is the accessory. [She was a very very nasty lady (w/Irish accent)]. Mr. Achtem needs you needs you all to understand and observe clearly as to exactly what happened in 1 minute and 39 seconds Lets see how nasty she really was. Please read with me while as I read out loud [Please view EXHIBIT #5 let's become well versed with Transcript page 109 -from line 3] Then we will we get to hear the audio of this moment when Justice Horner prevented Mr. Achtem from viewing Exhibits in which we know for certain at least Ms. Sails knew he knew nothing about soon after you get back from the lunch break.

(8)----- Later in the on day 3, we will examine what Ms. Sails's FRAUD aggregated into her. Then Mr. Achtem will have an expert witness, a CMA Accountant with his Balance Sheet will lay it all out for everyone from the Witness Box. That Justice Horner's Judgment did indeed net more than a 94.5%/5.5% split in Ms. Sails's favour. Then show some contrary evidence to what the truth is because numbers do not Lie. There is only one answer and one precise figure. There will be MINOR discrepancies on items discussed that is estimated matrimonial items. However, Mr. Achtem's facts, figures and numbers are bang on correct and the estimated figures were always over estimated in Ms. Sails's favour. So when we are done you will most certainly realize that the split was redicously loped side as a result of malfeasance and FRAUD into Ms. Sails's favour.

(9)----- Contrary to the truth Ms. Sails wrote in her Response to Mr. Achtem's Supreme Court of Canada Application, that she did not receive a 94.5/5.5% split in her favour which why she was charge for making a false statement in writing. Mr. Achtem will take you through the numbers, facts, and figure on Day 3 and on day 4 of the closing arguments phase of this Trial.

(10)---- Mr. Achtem reviews quickly with the jury a time line for the rest of his Jury Presentation:

Day 1 - Mr. Achtem from the Witness Box Evidence Presentation. Observation of Ms. Sails offences and some of Karen Horner's offences

Day 2 - Mr. Achtem from the Witness Box an Evidence Presentation more observation of Ms. Sails's offences and finishing off observation of Karen Horner's Offences.

Day 3 - Mr. Achtem from the Witness Box Evidence Presentation observation of Ms. Sails's and Karen Horner, Robert Rehm's offences. The completion of Karen Horner's offencesDay 4 - (a short day) Closing Arguments (unless the defence take more than half the day, Then it is up to the Jury. )

(11)---- Mr. Achtem will not be having an opening argument after the introduction of Evidence. He will let the evidence speak for itself. Then hand the floor over to the Defence to hear their cross-examination. then after the Defence presents will open the argument stage of this trial Then Mr. Achtem will close with only a rebuttal. Then defence welcome to an opportunity to rebuttal Mr. Achtem's Rebuttal as well. (point at the judge) If it's ok with that fine fine fellow over there Mr. Justice?[Wait for a response from judge - EST 3 mins]

(12)---- Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury, See ya back here within 1 hour, Thank you.

[ 11:50 am Adjourn - Break , Lunch hour]

[09] Victim/Witness Statement, Day 1 PM of Jury Trial

[[1: 10 pm]

To see full current case file Affidavit for Judicial Review goto; http://rhondasails.blogspot.com

(13)---- Ms. Sails did NOT inform Mr. Achtem or the Court that her "2nd Bundle of Documents", contained documents in which Ms. Sails did NOT informed Mr. Achtem of any intent prior to Trial. Ms. Sails did not inform Mr. Achtem that he had to answer to her Exhibits M to R Prior to Trial as the law states she must inform. At 11:31 a.m. Mr. Achtem was handed the "2nd Bundle of Documents" while he was still in a 'remaining in the Witness Box position' because he was just cross-examined by Justice Horner. then moments later still 11:31 a.m. Mr. Achtem asked Justice Horner; "Yeah, why don't you give me a few minutes to go through this". Meaning the "2nd Bundle of documents" before having to open the Bundle to view the contents before having to answer to a suspicous "2nd Bundle of Documents" Then Horner replies very deceptively; "you'll have some opportunity. Miss Achtem gets to ask you a question. Then all of the sudden I was still in the witness Box confused by Justice Horner's reply, which was unintellegiable. Mr. Achtem was not even provided 2 minutes before having to open Ms. Sails's (Achtem) 2nd Bundle of Documents and answering to them.

(14)---- it still being 11:31 a.m. Justice Karen Horner proceeded have Ms. Sails carry out cross-examination. Then at 11:43 a.m. at Exhibit M it suddenly turned into malicious cross-examination. When Mr. Achtem flipped the page from Exhibit L to Exhibit M. At this piont is when Ms. Sails preceeded with her malicous cross-examination in till the end Exhibit R. Ms. Sails (Achtem) knew very well Mr. Achtem knew did not expect having to answer to Exhibits M to R. Ms. Sails, may have deceive potencially the Trial Judge Justice Karen Horner, unless she was hungover or smoking weed. Unless Justice Horner actions of participation in the FRAUDSTERS FRAUD was NOT carried out by her own intent. The Evidence and Exhibits here will clearly show that Justice Karen Horner was knowinly and delibertately involved as an acessory to Ms. Sails's FRAUD. Because Karen Horner who was the judge who had access to all records, and made the was noway that she c ould have not observed the Fraud before Preparing a judgment based on Ms. Sail's FRAUD. Karen Horner was not the good Judge who could have prevented Ms. Achtem's Fraud. She had access to examine all materials produced from the Trial, Pre-trail and everthing else in the Achtem v Achtem action. There was noway Karen Horner could have not known that she was an acessory to Ms. Achtem's Fraud the moment she signed her judgment. Karen Horner and Ms. Sails did NOT respect Canada Evidence Act c-5.


(15)---- Ms. Sails deliberately prepared the ambush with a rigged "2nd Bundle of Documents". She deliberately and tactfully rigged this an it deceived Mr. Achtem. By how she prepared her surprise "2nd Bundle of Documents" prepared especially for Trial. This "2nd Bundle of Documents" contained Exhibit A to R. Only Exhibits A, B, L1, and L2 were filed prior to Pre-trial and were the only Exhibits that were taken from her first "1st Bundle of Documents" that was filed prior to Pre-trial. Then she tactfully placed the last 6 Exhibits M to R at the end of her "2nd Bundle of Documents". Ms. Sails tactfully placed Exhibits M to R behind Exhibit A to L. Having Exhibits M to R at the end of her "Bundle of Documents" Would mean that Mr. Achtem would be answering to cross-examination over Exhibits which she did NOT prepare Mr. Achtem at least 7 days before Trial. Then Ms. Sails the one who knew how to attack Mr. Achtem cross-examination gave Mr. Achtem a smooth flow of cross-examination. Then when Ms. Sails went onto cross-examination of Mr. Achtem from Exhibit M to L. It was like everything was ok, but then Ms. Achtem moves onto to her cross-examination of Mr. Achtem. He flips the page over to Exhibit M. It was like Mr. Achtem was done cross-examination of Exhibit L, so It was time for Mr. Achtem to turn the page over to Exhibit M. and then BAM BAM BAM Mr. Achtem was completey thrown off kilter. Justice Horner also participated in this ambush too Mr. Achtem as the Witness. Please view Ms. Achtem's "List of Exhibits" from her 2nd "Bundle of Documents" and her Exhibits M, N, O, P, Q, R. Next, Please observe all of Ms. Achtem's Exhibits M to R, and observe the date of the e-mails. Then go back to Ms. Achtem's original 1st "List of Exhibits" that was filed before Pre-trail. Now after viewing the dates on the e-mails as per Ms. Achtem's Exhibits M to R on her 2nd "Bundle of Documents". Do the dates all coresspond with the dates with the dates in Ms. Achtem's 1st "List of Exhibit" which is the list showing Ms. Achtem's intent of what documents she was to use at Trial? Do the dates all match up? After you have observed all said ask yourself, but keep it to yourself and your jury member "Did Ms. Sails (Achtem) carry out a covert Fraud that obstructed the course of justice?"

(16)---- Mr. Achtem will have Madame Clerk play Audio Transcript on May 17, 2007 Court Rm #3 Medicine Hat (was in prov. due to contruction. Play from Trial from: 11: 30 am to 11:42 am

Internet user click here for the You Tube video forward the video to 6:00 unless you want to here Mr. Achtem's Rant: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6gHPrHI9RI

(17)---- Now that we have viewed how Ms. Sails deceived Mr. Achtem with her rigged exhibits, please view [Ms. Sails's SCC Responce, Part III page 9. Read and observe carefully paragraphs 34, and 35. EXHIBIT Mr. Achtem will not comment about this as it speaks for itself, but do make note of her talking about Mr. Achtem having a disabity, and we will get into that later on day 3 stage 3 and day 4 the Closing Argument.

(18)---- Mr. Achtem will direct your focus in mainly on the Transcipt from page 109 to 128 and a few other pages. Whatever you see in the transcipt that sticks out in your mind then you are to keep it to your fellow jury members when deliberating.

(19)---- Ok, now we have completed the 1st day. Part evidence phase with portions of Ms. Sails's offence - paragraph 380(a) Fraud over $5,000. Since we are now done Mr. Achtem wants to draw your attention to a [Letter Ms. Sails wrote to the Court of Appeal of Alberta September 12, 2007 - EXHIBIT #7] that I want you to look at in you spare time this evening and give it some deep thought. Ask youself "Why would Ms. Sails send a letter to the Court of Appeals of Alberta state in 2nd sentence of the 2nd paragraph; "The Appellant had plenty of time before the Trial to obtain any information he felt relevant and to support his case." In the court of Appeal Mr. Achtem was the appellant which is just so you know who The Appellant is. Mr. Achtem wants to take that and think hard. This letter will become the smoking Gun later and it will become a real kicker on Day 3. We get more into it tomorrow too for only 5 minutes Otherwise thank you for being here today ladies and gentlmen of the Jury. Have a fine fine day

[END TIME EST: 2:30 p.m.]

[11] Witness/Victim Statement - Day 2 AM of Jury Presentation

Start time 10:00 am]

At Trial Ms. Sails knew everything about Mr. Achtem and she knew Mr. Achtem better than anyone. She was with him for more than 14 yerars. She knew how to attack his disabilty of short-term memory function better than anyone at the time of Trial. Mr. Achtem has suffered from MS the effects intense pain which is known to many MSers as a pins and needles effect. The intense pain in Mr. Achtem Head, and in various parts of his body The results is the result of demialtion of Mr. Achtemever since the day he woke up the morning of November 11, 1998 next to Mrs. Sails who was his wife at the time Mrs. Achtem. Mr. Achtem claims that their is no precise way to tabulate at any given moment. The painful sensation horse kick him in the head. waking up having intense pain going from doctor to doctor to docter. From medical clinic to midical clinic tto medical clinic. And going to at least 4 or 5 hostipals. Trying fine a way to deal an intense pain on the leftside of his head. Completely left in the dark as to what was wrong. Then a MediCentre doctor sent Mr. Achtem to Neurologist Dr. David Patry sometime in Mid-December 1998. Which is when Dr. Patry informed Mr. Achtem that It looks like he may have Multiple Sclerosis. Dr. Patry Confirmed March of 1999 Mr. Achtem has a UNCURABLE diagnosis of MS.


Mrs. Sails observed Mr. Achtem's disease progress from November 1998 on ward and there is no cure for. Mr. Achtem's disease do continue to progress. ich later she did not want him anymore because MS hindered Mr. Achtem's employability, his lacking physical and sexual proformance. Mr. Achtem's short-term memory caused by MS that constantly joggs his conversation abilities over things that have not been registered in his long-term memory function which is well intact. Mr. Achtem and Ms. Sails both knew his long-term memory is enhance because Mr. Achtem does not forget alot if he has reviewed and reviewed again and again and again. When it's new material then Mr. Achtem will need the time to become well versed on it. Ms. Sails who knew how to attack Mr. Achtem's memory better than anyone decided to attack him with old e-mails as rigged Exhbits yo fool Mr. Achtem, and boy did she ever make him feel like a fool for which he did NOT deserve it. He had no access to the e-mail because his computer crashed, and how anyone and Mr. Achtem who sends hundreds of e-mails every month, going to remember old 2.5 year old e-mails. During the time of first 4 months of separation Mr. Achtem and most men do send hundreds to their separated wife that they still love and out of dispare they send numerous e-mails. Mr. Achtem did this just because he wanted to reconcile his marriage with Ms. Sails and to be with his daughter for which Ms. Achtem FRAUD and judges eye balling up the fact that Mr. Achtem want to use some of the proceed of his matrimonial to help with paying for suppervised visits with my daughter. It was Justice Rawlins from Pre-trial who was eye balling up the fact that Mr. Achtem wanted to use funds from the proceeds of his matrimonial.

[1]

1

[6]

6

[7]

7

[8]

8

[9] Desrepancies in "The Reasons of Judgment of Justice Horner" Verus Evidence

Paragraph 3 states; "RRSPs investments and cash on hand at the time of separation."

RRSPs is RRSP. It is not RRSPs. It should singular not Pural. Mr. Achtem has never owned an RRSP in life ever. However Ms. Achtem was the only party that had an RRSP which was entered into evidence on page

[11]

11

[13] For Future Posting