To Lady Justice Chiefs’ of the Court of Appeal of Alberta and
of the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta
Regarding: QB# 4808 009302 | Appeal# 0701-0232AC
| SCC#: 32805 | FC#: T-1724-10
Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta,
Medicine Hat
Achtem v. Achtem
“With Prejudice”
The
American President Donald John Trump’s self-draining swamp theory is NOT a
conspiracy.
Pull
the drain plug, then the world will see them all fall out
[1] My court is inviting you lady Justice Chiefs of Alberta, to a fine opportunity for the Canadian peoples court of record to expand it's meaning without the fear of influence of being bullied or harassed. And to expand it's meaning to escalate the Plaintiff's case because it is required to be rectified to come to the point. So that the Plaintiff's court is in a good standing position before his court is in proper order to the 2 sides of the defined fence, before his court can move in motion. The fence being the boundaries of law and the rules of court. The Plaintiff insists this is your duty to become involved in this matter on both sides of the said fence. For the Plaintiff to a cleanup operations within his court, and to move in motion to make Canada Great Again. By creating a pack with the Plaintiff in an ultimate endevour to make court houses great for the Plaintiff and for every people and citizen. And in every court house and throughout your jurisdiction. Alberta Justice? Up to the Prime Minister and all Premier’s of every province and Territory’s. A good spanking clean up of corruption and jail for the corrupt ones' like citizen’s that deliberately corrupt transcript using re-layered data on FTR audio file disks. Justice Dallas Miller is the judge who boosted about spanking his kids. Perhaps grant my court the power the deliver a good spanking on Justice Miller’s bottom, as in his bottom line and free-time? And of course you me everyone knows there is a far mile of a better way. To have a so much of better way to have results without infestations. Ramp up the Plaintiff's case to higher ground of quality high standards? Un-infested, pre-ordained law and rules of court, have law management and make more opportunity to make court work keeping each other in check. And more importantly I demand that only a 25 member Grand Jury is to judge the judges. NOT you and your colleagues all judging each other and frankly that. The Canadian people cannot tolerate it any longer. In any case that is impossible to say that this is not a breach of the separation of powers principal of those who work at our court houses, to become hero’s, just for cleaning it up, and for you citizens’ you are be fine, with zero corruption for judges and for the Lady Justice Chiefs’? You are in your office and you must work for a better way, Here is my pitch.
[2] This is going to be like a cake walk for me, and as for you I hope so too. If you have a strong heart, then reach into it. Then pull it all out. Because it is your requirement to enjoy your job and if you really do then you may have what it takes to be the best of the best. Because whoever does NOT come out with the Truth that this takes, because who ever does NOT come out to turn a new leaf to lift the Plaintiff's to total truth. Because who ever does NOT come to reveal what they are hiding? Then I say this will NOT be a such a nice cake walk for them. I need somebody whereas this will be a real cake walk for whoever the next judge is going to be, I have finally have become well versed on the common law so shucks what is it with Justice Hugh’s my God, she could have yielded to nothing less than perfection unless it was painted up that way for her in the public domain that she is impeccable my God what is this world coming too? I am not confused about anything and I know what everybody did wrong except for Justice Hughes. She is in the scope of the curse, but NOT in the cross-hair of the scope, and my hope is that she will not get caught in the cross-hairs. Now, I have my new found power, but it is ancient, but it is still the law of the land since before we were born in. A few somebodies who work for Court of Queen’s Bench that works under you. I honestly know that an unknown citizen(s) who work at Queen’s Bench also too worked in sync with Counter Plaintiffs with with whatever Justice is in the helm. They operated their nisi prius court together, to rig my court Trial by way of over running my court with their nisi prius court to overrun the Plaintiff’s court with the Counter Plaintiff And the Judges combined their efforts together in sync to take down The Plaintiff by way of catering to fraud by way of them using their nisi prius court ran over, buy over running the Plaintiff’s court and all judges jumped over the fence to the other side where corrupters have deliberately LIED to the Plaintiff’s court. Railroading his court into a Trial by Ambush which no body can make disappear unlike the transcript data was altered just the same way Barack O’bama’s fake birth certificate was made. This will truly be detected by the forensic Lab systems analysts. Nobody can get away with that. My God, who do these people think they are? Who removed all the missing verbatim, and I demand that you are to put it back ok? If not someone else and myself are going have a much bigger problem if you do not put back the transcript and audio that was removed? Make it simple and download the full transcript or my problems will be escalated even further. View the May 4 Hearing transcript which is missing 30% to 35% verbatim. This is NOT the legit court of record transcript (period). This is when the first agreement made concerning exhibits has already been wiped clean from the transcript and the plaintiff requires knowledge of the citizens names of who work at Queen's Bench that sabotaged it from the transcript thus rendering to be NOT a legit court of record - [ATTACHMENT A]. View the May 4, 2006 corresponding Order of Justice Hughes - [ATTACHMENT B]
[3] Introduction to the Counter Plaintiff’s and the Judges’ Nisi Prius Court that launched a Trial by Ambush, and for the Plaintiff to announce that he is going start a public sector crook crime fighting organization. The Plaintiff’s complaint is multiple servants have carried out deliberate acts of damage control by way of sabotaging the dummy Plaintiff, to conduct a government cover up somewhere behind Queen's Bench operations to cover up for themselves because they have been using the Counter-Plaintiff’s have launched a nisi prius court at Court of Queen’s Bench. Whoever it is have forced conformity of multiple FTR Audio files and multiple transcripts to be deliberately forced off kilter, and damage control has always been in over-drive since or before the May 4, 2006 Hearing. The Plaintiff requirements are to carry out his goal which is All of Canada is to get with the times of today, to turn a new leaf in our Canadian courtrooms. THE TIME HAS COME TO BITE THE BULLET. WE MUST ACT NOW IN URGENT FASHION must install multiple cameras in sync with recorded sound? The Plaintiff is required to make motion to have multiple cameras in all our all court rooms’ clear across Canada to follow the same visual audio protocols as it is in the United State of America. The Achtem v. Achtem case is the Plaintiff’s first monster case. Because at first it became a measly father case and what THE WORLD, and the Lady Justice Chief’s will witness as the Hearing unfolds that it was a much bigger monster than the Plaintiff expected. But everyone will surely see how big it really is. You will come to the point, that you will become absolutely dumb-founded After that is done, then he wants take on the King Neptune case in Grand Bank, Newfoundland and anyone my view what I know about that case by going on the internet to view it. The Accused is a former Chief Justice and former Justice Minister of Newfoundland. He is accused of raping an 11 year old girl in a Grand Bank Masonic Lodge and she became pregnant. Then After Maury Popich invited T. Alex Hickman to offer him the fine opportunity to show the world that he is NOT the father. But Mr. Hickman did not go there with bells on. He did not go there (period). See that case here to get a view at what such a wonderful opportunity that case is. Anyone may delve into it and if you want you may watch the boring long video. www.lawliars.blogspot.ca
[4] My hope about that King Neptune case. I sure hope that I will not have to pull Hickman’s body out of his grave to get his DNA? What you just read and saw in your mind is the scary truth. It’s a far mile more scary than this Achtem v. Achtem case. Ok, now we concentrate our Attention to the Achtem v. Achtem case from this point on all the other stuff in the paragraph above can only be done on your own private time. That case has no relevance I only want to tell you of this small fragment of my plan. And maybe give yourself a little break because what you just read above is hard to stomach. Judges are required to have strong Hearts, and to pull it all out everyday to be able to stomach hard issues… Yeah after you have had a little stomach break read the rest.
[5] This is NOT my wish. It is the reverse onus curse which stems from curse of Justice Horner because of the Counter-Plaintiff and one or more who work at Court of Queen’s Bench. Are going to be stuck in the cross hairs of the scope of the said reverse onus curse. That is who wished for fraud, but for fraud to NOT be fraud? Their wish came true. Which has now become part of the scope of the reverse onus curse in the name of Justice Karen Horner. Some body made a wish to have audio and transcript removed. Which can only be a person(s) who works at the Court of Queen’s Bench. So, a public agent provocateur made this wish too, so their came true too, whoever it is suspense in the scope of the reverse onus curse. Who is this other provocateur? We shall seek them out with the scope to see who is in still in the scope, but Not in the cross hairs of reverse onus curse, but what I am seriously hoping is that Justice Hughes will NOT be stuck into the cross-hairs. If we do NOT know or if Chief’ Justices’ have no way of knowing, then you have much more of a genuine monster of a problem than I will ever have staring me in the face in my life.
3.
[6] This now is the
problem staring you right in the face and the people’s organization called Queen’s
Bench there Lady Justice Chief’s. Here you go chew on this. The Plaintiff’s request is you both must go
to work, and everyone is being tested and the world is watching. The Plaintiff wants to indemnify you both to
his court until the FTR matter is resolved or becomes rectified properly so that the
Plaintiff can kick his court off in motion. This is NOT my wish that the daughter of the former
marriage (my 1st daughter) is to continue to believe that her father
is guilty of her mother’s fraud in such a convoluted way. The Counter-Plaintiff and the judges’ nisi prius
court as decided the fate of the Trial at least as possibly 13 to 15 months
before the Trial even happened. A dummy Plaintiff was in the cross hairs of
their scope long before Trial kicked off and now, they want the Plaintiff to go
away and just die this way.
[7] The way of
their nisi prius Court and it was Not the Plaintiff’s Court that did do
that. You make this stop and then you
are to craft or create it so that Rhonda Rose Sails who is formerly Rhonda Rose
Achtem is to be compelled to become in the state of deep remorse to feel it badly. The child of the marriage is now an Adult who
can take it like an Adult like I had some time in the late 70’s past older and
more than likely they are dead judges that threw my father in the slammer to
serve a 6 year sentence for which he claimed Frank Jones is the primary cause. If Rhonda Sails provides the Plaintiff with a
good snitch job on section 61 judges and another servant. Then that will be her only way in my opinion is
what her accessories did to get a lighter sentence
[8] I know first-hand that Achtem kids can take having a parent in jail to do there hard time So the best way for her to learn is for her to realize her mother’s is in jail for contempt of court. To have it my way I say throw her in jail now until she stews for at least a month or so and can earn good credit for doing good snitch job on judges. I have NOT talked to our daughter and I have made my choice to NOT speak to her for a very long time. So when and if that happens I want hand off of my family period and that is no bodies business. I want The Counter-Plaintiff and Justice Karen Horner to be arrest arrested by the police as soon as possible to do 6 years in jail for Justice Horner and other judges who get caught in my cross hairs I want them serving 2 more years in jail than Rhonda Sails would be nice. Then a year later the Plaintiff / victim can write the judge of the case a victim’s letters’ about progress while they all still remain in jail would be nice.
4.
[9] I am sad because I have not in seem my 1st
daughter Kayla’s since December of 2005 because of Rhonda Sails and because has
been in twined into a nisi prius pact functioning with multiple section 61
judges. They are all 100% the cause that
prevented me to be to be in our daughter’s life since she was 4 years old
because her nisi prius court pact with Justice Miller driving the helm scared
the living pants off of the Plaintiff using his men in black like those grumpy
guys that look like tuff men who go looking for a fights in bars, I saw in
their face that they love the feel of getting pleasure at slamming people up
against the brick wall or something more horrible The experience with them and
Justice Miller totally pillaged my emotions.
And this is just one of the many reasons to have Camera in our courts. Nobody should be subjected to such an engineered
environment to be conducive to driving into their target emotionally, targeted
is in our courts, and in places where people need to talk like adults and have
some class too.
[10] Have some class please I’m just a 160-pound skinny stick man with MS. Those two men in black have poor class tell them to bug off and to never be in my court again, and provide me with their names? They made me craw into a shell for too long 6 extra years. And I hope that the FTR audio file has not been tampered with, but I can count on it that it has already been cooked up by someone(s) who works at Queen’s Bench. I would like to bet anyone a $1,000.00. Then I say the chances are nil or next to nil or zero that the FTR audio has not been cooked up. 100% transcripts have NOT become a part of the court employees tradition. A Tradition that must stop now. I demand full transcripts please?. Make full transcript replacements do them all over again free of Charge please and next time make sure nothing is removed.
[11] Now I have 2 daughters’ who have never met, and only one of them has always live with me still a child. I demand that status quo is escalate my court’s position is in the best interest of my a 12 year old child and she is sad to never get the opportunity to meet her older 17 year old half-sister, and sometimes she blames me for it.
[12] The undefined law of best interest of the child remain with my 2nd daughter’s interest, and she would love to give Justice Miller and Horner an earful too. And boy does she ever have serious vocal power. And sometimes my 2nd wife blames me that her and her step daughter have never met. And corrupt Judges have only one people me to blame is the Plaintiff and I will NOT accept being blamed for anything I did NOT do. Those nisi prius Judges are 100% to blame for everything they did do.
5.
[13] Rhonda Rose Sails is only about less
than 50% blame. As for Legal Aid Lawyer
they hired Kathleen Linton. She truly is
100% to blame for phoning the Court of Appeal to lay down her narratives on the
Court of Appeal. [ATTACHMENT The Linton Exhibits]. Her narratives are of zero relevance. This is a genuine no no, and may she regret it,
and may you pull in so you can shake your finger at her and give a hard blast
with a $2,000 fine for contempt? And I am
calling her out for phoning my what is supposed to be my court which I know was
never my court to begin with. She had no
business doing this (period).
[14] A wished was made to have an agreement
concerning exhibits removed, and it really disappeared. A person(s) who works at Court of Queen’s
Bench did in fact carry out work to remove lots of verbatim. This wish came true because a nisi prius court
over ran by the Counter Plaintiff and Judges (NOT ran by the Plaintiff) purported
fraud whereas Judges worked in sync to deliberately turned blind eyes… It was
NOT the dummy Plaintiff. He did NOT run
his Court properly because of the vindictive Trial Judges and the vindictive Counter-Plaintiff
working together in sync with the nisi prius Trial. Together to attack a dummy Plaintiff in sync
with illegal cross-examination of illegally use of documents which were NOT adduced
into Trial. Hold that thought for a
moment. Canadians do NOT want Judges using
a nisi prius courts to operate in this fashion in attacking retarded people or
people with intermittent short-term recall disabilities, and they do not want Trial
judges and Counter Plaintiff’s attacking the witness box just like they already
[15] Using a secret rigged nisi prius court that predetermined decisions
before it gets to Trial is horrible Low blow breach of Jurisdiction in fathoms. And nothing was adduced (period). Only illegal documents were used by the Counter
Plaintiff which she did NOT disclose. She
used documents that were never disclosed never adduce she used what was NOT
disclosed the same documents She really did disclose no less than 14 days for
Trial in Alberta, she did NOT use those legal documents. The judges’ nisi prius court breached s. 28of the Canada Evidence Act. Because this
is what the Counter Plaintiff and what the Trail Judge did together long before
Trial had even started. The fate of the
matrimonial property had been decided to become rigged weeks before Trail. The appeal panel is in contempt just for saying
documents were adduced, but nothing was adduced. I am calling them out and the
Trail Judge, and the Counter Plaintiff, and Justice Miller all
6.
calling them out for contempt. And I am calling out The Federal Court of
Canada judge for contempt for him for his Fibbing to The Plaintiff’s court /
Applicant’s court.
[16] Nothing was adduced. This was NEVER a legit judgment and it was NEVER a legit Court of record either. It can only be identified a genuine verifiable curse that was launched by Stephan Harper’s and Doug Horner’s cousin Justice Karen Horner of the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta, on the 13th day of July 2007 [see ATTACHMENT A]. The moral of this story is, do NOT make curses, they come back in tenfold…
[17] C O M P A I N T of 3 or more forged transcripts and FTR audio files and it is suspected that it already happened again at the April 12, 1212 Hearing with Justice Miller. Does anybody want to make a friendly bet that audio has already been remove? I can count on it for being hacked I assure you that And one Pre-trial Audio was already confirmed as hacked, but Alberta Justice failed to inform the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff did NOT even think of asking because he was too dumb at that time, so now I am NOT dumb anymore and Justices Miller surely picked the wrong Achtem boy to pick on. Thus using more than $41,000.00 of his matrimonial property and they used Rhonda Sails as a tool too to pick on the dummy Plaintiff by using their nisi prius court as the weapon and using their job and their black robes and using their place of work in the name of the Queen her court rooms to launched the said weapon. Nisi prius must be used in a nice way, and I do see it could be a benefit to both parties provided that you prided and equal Lady Justice or man justice then court’s could have been used in a nice way really, But they were NOT so nicely used, by citizen’s who have no sovernty. In this case it’s all premeditated fraud purported by the Counter Plaintiff and with multiple judges as accessories’ for using nisi prius court with poor class (period).
[18] Nisi Prius could do better if used in the proper way with manners and class. Theirs was low class that involves citizens who work at Court of Queen’s Bench. They are to enjoy their jobs and they will surely regret not being able to continue enjoying what they did to the Plaintiff with no class. Treating all people equally with the highest standard of class is a must, vital for every court especially nisi prius. Multiple judges colluded to use a nisi prius court that operated from within the Queen’s court with NO class their nisi prius union was used for catering to fraud in the name of Regina Saxe Cothberg Gotha (aka Elizabeth Windsor | Elizabeth II - House of Windsor).
7.
Justice
Horner is an extra-long far mile more to blame for this Trial by Ambush than
Rhonda Sails is. Because Justice Horner Jumped over the fence to the other
side.
[19] So ok, we know that she is affirmatively in the cross-hairs of the scope. But since it’s is noticed 13 years later. The scope is looking into that this could potentially be a pay to play scheme in suspense. We at least know now the Justice who carried the kill shot to the case as the Trial. We still need to see if we need to have Justice Hughes in the scope, but NOT in the cross-hairs. We must see were this scoping is going to take my court. Which from this day on it will no longer be the Counter-Plaintiff’s and judges nisi prius court for which I can see in clear daylight that is what it is. Now that is all gone there Dear Mrs. Sails. I really hope my findings of my scope will still become that Justice Hughes is still an always was the best of all the best common law judge’s there is, that any court could ever have. Her reputation is impeccable! We are now only scoping Justice Hughes to see where that goes with a notice to admit, before even considering if she could be in the cross-hairs of the scope, like Justice Horner is, and Justice Rawlins’s is in contempt for a ditzy breach the functus officio doctrine. If anyone was to listen to the FTR audio of the Pre-trial I do not know how anyone cannot say the Pre-trial Judge was NOT ditzy that day. Sometimes people can have ditzy days and this is a fact. I have had more ditzy day than anyone can shake a stick at.
[20] As for Justice Hughes she sure did strikes
as someone who is never ditzy. I think
she does not even know how to be ditzy, even if she tried hard to act ditzy. But yeah go listen to the Pre-trail then
after just try to dare to tell me or others Justice Rawlins did not sound ditzy
at Pre-trial. To say she was NOT a fiber. We just still do NOT know all about Justice
Hughes other than she is a real sharp cat, but at least I know her better for
who she really is. I pray that she
always was NOT bad in my case. She could
be, but I hope NOT. Please do scoping behind the Bench there Lady
Justice Chiefs’ because it is required?
Restoring the verbatim and finding out who ordered verbatim removal and
who is the worker that carry it out will end the cross hairs of the scope
totally then we have this missing transcript dilemma over with, then we can be
happy.
8.
[21]
I do NOT know if this was a Pay to Play deal cut between the Counter Plaintiff
and judges. But what we do know is the
prema facie evidence is, it is fact that Judges did play on the wrong side of
the fence of law exceeding their Jurisdiction to injure the Plaintiff by way of
deliberately exceeding boundaries for literally (not physically) jumping over
the fence to the wrong side. The fence being
the boundaries of law and the rules of court.
There’s a good side and there is a bad side
Suspected is 3 or more FTR audio files are hacked,
1 of the 3 is already confirmed that somebody already attempted to remove the
Pre-trial Judge’s breach of the functus officio doctrine.
[22] The Plaintiff questions, when was 35 to 40 percent of verbatim removed from the May 4, 2006 Hearing? Was it remove right after the Hearing? Or was it removed in August of 2018 when it was the only the only possible time this could have become noticed 14 years. Was it removed from the FTR audio file 14 years ago? When did the tampering occur? Please provide the Plaintiff the required prima facie evidence of this. And never have judges judging anyone more than 20 years younger. Never again! Judges must be no less than 20 years older than any one they are to judge. I know this the Plaintiff wants to escalate this at the Hearing, even before the Plaintiff the Plaintiff raises the issue of Just Rawlins’s breach of the functus doctrine, she subsequently blew the doors of the said common law doctrine. And in statute she blew the doors of that too. We are having a real problem with judges all working in sync with them forming a nisi prius court that carried intentions to have the Trial Judge deliver the kill shot to the Plaintiff’s court. An issue now is. So How old is Justice Hughes? And is she still as sharp as she was 14 years ago. Because I am having a hard time believing that Justice is the one that would remove 35 percent of the verbatim from a transcript. The Plaintiff question biggest objection that this belief does NOT sit so well with him. I am having a hard time believing that she carry out the act of removing FTR audio data of the record. Somebody needs to prove that Justice Hughes she really did such a horrible act that leads to indictable offences. Come on now Justice Hughes has a far mile more way more class than that! But the perplexing fact is The Plaintiff knows for fact that verbatim has been extensively removed
9.
[23] This
3 time play on verbatim is absolute tyranny over the mild of man. Is this play on words going to happen to the
April 12, 2012 Hearing FTR Audio file or has destruction already happened? Stop
Alberta Justice from ripping of the people their Lady Justice Chief’s I do NOT
know I Demand Just the audio and will hire a private transcriptionist and you make
sure I will NOT pay for it? And I ask
permission to bring my own reel to reel cassette recording machine, and I demand
multiple cameras are to be used from this time on. Do it as it is done in the USA. I demand cameras in the court room will be a
main issue next time at the court of Appeal.
It will become the Constitutional challenge in my common law court of
appeal. In America the Judgment is
called duly repugnant or unduly.
[24] Not too many Judges and lawyer are not too good with common law. But I know who Justice Hughes is much more today than 14 years ago. She was my driving force and to find out if she did NOT remove verbatim would break my Heart. My wish is someone else is to blame I cried too many times over this already please find out that she did NOT do this BAD DEED? This is my wish.
and more requests for requirements that the
Plaintiff must carry out, whatever is required? and request of Plaintiffs insistence:
Chief’s Justices are to shake this case upside down like a cracker jack box so
that the world can see all public sector crooks fall out.
and complaint of multiple trespasses to the case as follows.
The Plaintiff wants his court to decide if it should
question the documents, and if it cannot move further until this is verbatim
ordeal is Judged fairly. Citizens can make
the Law Justice Hughes ordained as being fraud disappear from FTR audio files,
but nobody can make fraud disappear at all.
Make it so it will it NOT be possible to NOT
turn blind eyes this next time please.
Dear Lady Justices of both Chiefs’
offices of the Court of Appeal of Alberta and of the Court of Queen’s Bench of
Alberta,
[25] This is my second complaint over verbatim being removed. This time the Plaintiff’s complaint is that all transcript did in fact have the most vital verbatim on it deliberately removed, extensively removed from every single transcript. He paid for them. Now gives rise to suspect every single FTR
10.
audio file has significantly been already tampered
with by somebody? And who Ordered the
removal of verbatim? And who did the
physical work to remove recorded sound? I
have NOT yet addressed this. I missed it
and sometimes forget, but NO! I do NOT
forget anything. Just one of those things
that slips one’s mind from time to time.
[26] There is one smaller detail I have NOT yet addressed over removed verbatim from the Trial transcript and FTR audio file which requires forensics needing Justices Horner’s Notice to Admit filled out and signed. Before it goes to forensics. I am addressing that today for the first time that is a small but a vital amount of verbatim is removed from the Trial too. You may NOT know this, but please feel that you must delve into this transcript tyranny. As I have then you will come know it as I know it, then you will see it come alive like a living breathing curse or creature or call it whatever. I know At least 35% to about 40% of verbatim has been removed. Because if you can give the full transcript then that will provide me the prema facie evidence by comparing to the one I have already paid for resulting in the plaintiff being cheated and ripped off.
[27] And I suspect verbatim from April 12, 1212 before Justice Miller has already been removed. I can clearly see, and nobody knows what happens behind closed doors where transcribe surely become pillaged by somebody(s) at Queen’s Bench. This is so deviant. My ultimate wish is for the mind came stop not now, but RIGHT NOW! What is the reason for this act of mayhem? Nobody wants to pay for transcripts that are slated to be doctored. I paid for 3 transcripts that were all doctored. I want my money return by TMS as well? In am so strapped for cash, so perhaps order them to pay me back now? And Order Clerk Jobagy to pay the Plaintiff $1000, and maybe for a far mile more money?
[28] Attempting to convince a Plaintiff that an
order that breached the functus officio doctrine does NOT exist. The Plaintiff knows for fact he’s got one or
more section .61 Judge nailed as accessories for the defrauding of the Plaintiff
with 97% split in the Counter Plaintiff’s favor from a 14-year marriage and zero
$0.00 exemptions. And there aint nothing
you I or anyone that can do anything about that (period). As of today you aint seen nothing yet Lady
Justices Chief’s. You just wait to see
what comes next. Next time I will call out
for contempt. And the biggest fib is
documents were adduced and if you feel documents were adduced there Lady
Justice Chief of the Court of Appeal.
Then I demand that this is to be proven.
Show me on the transcript which lines and pages? Line? is
11.
adducing
on it? And where and when did any Plaintiff
adduce document into a Trial? Documents
being adduce did not happen (period). It
was NOT a summary Trial either, so those Justice have a real problem. The
Appeal panel told fibs for a total of 11 times.
Yah God our mighty father Yah can make verbatim disappear butcha Yah
aint gonna make the fraud disappear, you can count on that. I’m calling out The Former Chief Justice
Wittman and Justice Dallas Miller for contempt.
Is Justice Wachowich still alive today?
And how old is he? But I do NOT know
that he not healthy enough to come to court to depose himself. How bout we get the feed back from Justice
Hughes first before the Plaintiff’s court can even consider to moving forward
in motions. The missing verbatim surely
MOOT-ized down the agreement concerning exhibits, but leaving in good fragments
of it which is to have documents or the witness is to have knowledge of which documents
that he is going to cross-examined on.
This is where these guys over in Medicine HAVE completely missed the
boat, then later deliberately turn bind eye in sync as a nisi prius pact
Both of you Chief Justice’s and my court require
3 videos as follows?
1st video of when the Plaintiff
enters the court room.
2nd video of when the Plaintiff leaves
the court room.
3rd video back some time ago after
Trail, at the Counter Plaintiff’s Hearing before Justice Wilkins. Before the Hearing the Counter plaintiff’s
Partner Virgil Sails walks up to the Plaintiff to laugh in his face in front of
the Clerk’s bench and the ladies. My
court requires that video?
[29] Make certain all verbatim is put back in? I DEMAND THAT ALL VERBATIM IS TO BE RESTORED.
Then after you have a duty assignment needing
to be competed. My request for you to
carry it out like a little task is to make certain I get the videos, and the requirements
to get them? Watch the videos and make
confirmation that the Hearing was 1 hour and 10 minutes long. Then consider? Does only a 37page transcript really add up to
a one hour and 10-minute-long Hearing? I do have a forensic expert standing by ready
to move on what TMS has baked up, just especially for the Plaintiff. A beautiful baked up transcript. That is just way to fricken funny ladies, and
humor is good self therapy. Feel free to
laugh because it feels good. But before
my demand is agreed to by you Lady Justice Chiefs’ is to propose Notices to Admit
for Judges and Ms. Jobagy, and provide those requirements and give your views
anyone else anyone you think of? And
what is the requirements to get them and anyone to depose?
We need to book a 2nd Hearing for
that and who knows how long that will take.
But in the future I will be sure to propose that plan
[30] This is also to address that I would NOT be surprised to find out more things involving Clerk Jobagy’s dereliction of duty, just because I already have prema facie evidence. Before going to the Hearing with Justice Hughes Shauna Jobagy sent mail to the Plaintiff, but to the wrong address, and because she did not send it to the Plaintiff’s address I want her to be fined $750.00? I DEMAND IT!
[31] Shauna Jobagy’s next act of dereliction is a kicker. Verbatim encompassing Justice Rawlins’s verbal breach of the functus officio doctrine was removed from the Pre-trail. Due to my complaint back then during the Appeal I was NOT well versed on the common law, and common law doctrines. And at the same time who does Shauna Jobagy think she is by attempting to try to convince a Plaintiff that there was no Pre-Trial Order to begin with. The Plaintiff must tell this is not the end of the trial. This NOT the begining of the Trial. THIS IS THE END OF THE BEGINNING OF THE TRIAL. $7,500.00 CONTEMPT FOR JUSTICE MILLER TO SAY THIS IS THE END OF THE TRIAL. If Justice Miller does NOT accept my offer then may it become escalated to $7,500.00 times 3. I was only called Shauna Jobagy to test her. I was NOT well versed on what the functus officio doctrine and what the separation of powers PRINCIPAL as I am today. The Pre-trial judge sounded a ditzy, and if you made room 100 people to listen to the FTR audio, everyone will have agree with the ditzy things Justice Rawlins had going on at Pre-trail. Shauna Jobagy target me as a dummy Plaintiff. And I do agree I was a dummy who did NOT know much about common law and constitutional law.
[32] Justice Hughes may NOT know this, but she had a far mile more positive effect on me while I delved into studies of common law for over 13 years. Gut feeling told me, if a Canadian delves into common law then it’s likely impossible to NOT know who Justice Hughes is, and what she is all about. She certainly is biggest part that made me NOT be that same dummy that I used to be, but the Plaintiff realizes he’s been bullied by more than one Judge and his wish is that this was NOT Justice Hughes that pillaged transcripts’ to coverup for Rhonda Rose Sail’s, Justice Horner’s, and Shauna Jobagy’s persons? The Plaintiff/ Counter Defendant asks his court to NOT leave him as suffering the effect of being cross-examined on documents the Counter Defendant knew nothing about before Trail kicked of unhinged from the Pre-ordained common law provided By Justice Hughes at the May 4, 2006 Hearing, Then at Trial it became Unhinged also from Constitutional law section 28 of the Canada Evidence Act. At Trial a there was combined nisi prius assault delivered to the Witness Box by both Justice Horner and the Counter-Plaintiff a premeditated secret nisi prius court, The Trial Judge Counter-Plaintiff delivered the kill shot together to the Plaintiff’s court to his case by using unknown documents that the Counter-Plaintiff knew all about the documents that both The Trial Judge the Counter-Defendant knew nothing about. Document that the Counter-Plaintiff did NOT inform the Counter Defendant as in a Notice of Intentions to use the documents was NOT provided to the Counter Defendant. However she used illegal documents that could NOT be used in theTrial. The Counter Plaintiff did in fact use them. And the Plaintiff’s position she must confess, and sometime people;e have to bite the bullet, Then Justice is to go in there and shake her finger at the Counter Plaintiff for so many thing she did that ultimately broke the law and surpassed the rule of court
[33] Transcript Management Services Regional attempted deleting verbatim but some person who works for our government is caught by the Plaintiff’s web of justice doing this deed, indeed. The Pre-trail judge beached the functus officio which went missing on the transcript for a half a day was removed until somebody became caught into that web. Who removed the Pre-trail judge’s breach of the functus officio doctrine from transcript? Now you tell me who this is? I demand it Please inform the Plaintiff of these persons contact information? And what is the Chief Justices view on this? the portion of the convoluted Pre-trail Order all the way to court adjourned, that made The plaintiff go Hmm IT MADE him FEEL LIKE yelling BINGO! And he was NOT even in the Bingo Hall, oh my God! And it really perplexed the Plaintiff mentally with 14 year of teeth naching. The Plaintiff has bad rotten teeth over it and I feel someone needs to pay for the Plaintiff’s $65,000.00 dental repair for which he cannot afford because the Plaintiff can see as clear as daylight That these citizens who carry out the law management in Medicine Hat have injured the Plaintiff dearly. For so many thingsa it really made his head spin for to long pacing floor worrying feeling sad for so many things, For which I will feel they will blame me point their finger at whatever and whoever I could go on and on and on about it. They deliberately exceeded their jurisdiction, and thereby injured the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff’s refuses to be blamed for any thing he did NOT do. If you feel I am to blame then you go prove it?>
[34] With the Order in his hand the Plaintiff
phoned the Trial Coordinator Shauna Jobagy and requested for her to send him a
copy of the Order, just to test her. She
stated the Order does NOT exist. Inspect all documents grouped together
[deleted transcript, denial of Pre-trail Order, Pre-trial Order recovered, and
Mr. Wachowich's letter too – EXHIBIT
25A, pages E104 to E109b]. Also consider at how
the Order was not given, and how it is drafted. Inspect the part TMS Regional
attempted deleting on the transcript. [line 36 on page 37 to line 17 on page 38
in EXHIBIT
T for Transcript portions]. Nobody, and NOT even Allen Wachowich who is performing a government
cover up cannot argue the Trial Coordinators directions, the agreement
concerning exhibits had to have been on the Order.
[35] Inspect Trial Coordinator directions, [QB
Civil practice Note 5 – Family Law Pre-trial Conferences – EXHIBIT
25B, page E109c]. Chief Justice Wachowich I suspect he
enjoyed carrying out a vendetta for Frank Jones on me to get back at my dad
over something that was not my fault. Frank Jones is a Former University of
Alberta Dean of Law. Over something
involving hookers and police, and my father rigged up the Police to bust Jones
not involving me that happened when I was a child.
[36] I am a Canadian who cannot tolerate it,
and did NOT get a fair Trial with a judge appointed by the family and
buddies... Canada is to not to be a feudal society (period). Because he wrote a
letter stating the portion of the Order was not on the Transcript because it
has no relevance to the substantive portions of the application. EXCUSE me this
was not an application it was a Pre-trial. Verbatim of an Order is substantive,
is required to be given to the parties, to be read into the record and on the
transcript and it sure better be on my transcript.
[37] If a judge crashes a car and does not
order it repaired. Then the next judge who drives the car does not notice it is
crashed, then he is driving a crashed car. If Judgments are corrected, then
that is what is acceptable. John F Kennedy delivered a famous speech before
multitudes back in September 1961. That speech where he was talking about taking
down multitudes of public sector crooks working for corporate crooks. JKF was
pretty much talking about throwing them all in the slammer.
[38] Within that speech he said; “...And
error does not become a mistake until you refuse to correct it...” I am
asking for errors which became mistakes before it became defacto appellant's
court mistakes, and it became the Plaintiff’s mess and the Chief Justices mess
too. Which requires you both to delving
into everything so that everything will become rectified? Letting Ms. Achtem get
away with illegal cross-examination, fraud, and false pretense and leaving me
suffering as a victim is a mistake. It is social engineering. There is no place
for social engineering in a matrimonial Trail.
My Trail was used by Justices whereas Stephan Harper & Doug Horner’s
cousin Justice Horner delivered the kill shot to the case. Then after, all Justices have turned blind
eye to the truth.
[39] The Plaintiff require knowing who are the citizens (as in I require getting their names? And address) of those working at Queen’s Bench that carried out this act of dereliction of duty? I demand it! Please provide every detail possible. Time? Date? Everything? If it’s NOT possible then why NOT? And if NOT, what are the requirements to make it possible? So that we all receive what is required. Lay it all out? Prove everything and explain requirements? I tell you all I know now is status quo is for people to work in their citizen or persons citizen’s work at Queen Bench to enjoy their jobs, but I do NOT feel they are to enjoy their jobs when exceeding jurisdiction.
[40] I
will follow up with a follow letter after hearing at least getting confirmation
that you have this letter, and in 30 days you can send a reply and of course I
know you have to get moving on more close door meeting stuff or whatever finger
pointing session you may be required to do, or whatever I do NOT know transparency
will always be highly convoluted. It’s a good thing that I have sent you the
curse of Justice Horner. All I know now
is a legit court of record has NOT existed since May 4, 2006 due to some
citizen who works at Queen’s Bench has been destroying cause the Plaintiff so
much damage
[41] What
that Statue of Lady Justice, the lady with the blindfold and balanced scales
what that represents has been destroyed 13 months before Trial. The scales in my court were deliberately knocked
off kilter for in favor of the Counter Plaintiff before Trial
[42] I am asking the two Lady Chief Justice’s to have a strong Heart. Then reach into it and pull it all out. I am a persecuted people, have MS and tired of fibers and cheaters. Remember Jesus said seek the Truth and truth shall set you free.
[43] I demand that Rhonda Rose Sail (Rhonda Rose Achtem make confession to NOT having cross-exam on her true disclosure of Documents. And that the Trial Judge railroaded Edward Daren Achtem into. And that judges knew it all along before Trial. And I demand that she snitch out Karen Horner, and her court employee friends, and Justices involved as being the accessories to her fraud. Which could possibly help her get reduced sentences. For when she becomes charged for contempt, and for when the cops move in on her. I encourage you sand your fellow justices to engage in whistle blowing too, and make certain that their jailing and meals are NOT paid for by the tax payers
[44] Contact me so that we can discuss nailing down a good time to Book a Common Law Court, that comes with a common law judge in Medicine Hat? And what’s your idea as to what is a great judge? Any goods names out there? I was hoping to use Justice Hughes, but that’s a no go I guess. Dam she was good perhaps I did NOT know her better than she knows herself. Who knows maybe Justice will find the missing verbatim, and she could catch a crook behind the Bench too? She is impeccable! So try to get someone like her that knows common law like her? I will require 9 minutes or less at the first Hearing. Just make sure our judge has knowledge and becomes well versed on every piece of material before the Hearing kicks off.
[45] And there Ladies of the chief Justice Office
you have a duty to call the Police. Tell
them that they must go carry out their duty law the law on Mrs. Rhonda Rose Sails
who was formerly Rhonda Rose Achtem, then arrest her and tell them they must
book her for paragraph 30.a what ever it is in statute , Just Hughes’s
pre-ordained common law of Fraud. That was subsequently deliberately removed
from the transcript for the May 4, 2006 Hearing. Because this is what happened in the eye of
my court. I suggest do whatever it take
to make certain it is going to be on the next FTR Audio file that I demand that
it is to have all transcript NOT removed.
If the Police do NOT make an arrest, then you Order them to carry out
their duty and to stop Medicine Hat Police Service from exceeding their
jurisdiction. Then have it so that
Rhonda Sails will have to go to court through the side door in an orange jump
suit or a prison smock whatever they have so that she has to suite up for
court. Then you will book my court in
Medicine Hat. And then I will come to
Medicine Hat for the Hearing. This is my plan the next time me and my
ex-wife meet she will have go to court in an orange Jump suit.
Thank
you all the ladies on gentlemen of the Chief’s Justices Offices’ of Alberta
[46] And remember that I said you have NOT seen anything yet. I will wait for your response for about 25 day. Then if I have NOT heard from you then I will write a different Letter to the Queen. And just a little note Regina Saxe Cothberg Gotha (aka Elizabeth Windsor) for envoking Law Rebellelion Magna Carta 1215 So I will wait for a response from both courts’ Chiefs’
The Tail of Two Half Sisters’
\
Elizabeth ll is NOT my Queen because her direct ancestor’s executioner chopped
the head of my maternal family’s and my 2 daughters’s direct ancestor Mary Queen
of Scots. And in life have you ladies
ever realized that James I and his mom are not related by blood to anyone from
the House of Windsor. This is fact and
if anyone did the research then they will know too like I do. And lineage tracking has become my forte and so has the common law. Well nobody can learn everything a day. But reading this sure was a learning experience
wasn’t it, of things that you may have NOT known? Research confirm it then you
will know to be true, NOT just like you know it. You only know that I said it you must confirm
what people and citizens say. You only
know what I said and you have NOT confirmed everything and you may if you
choose? Or you can always hire some to
lay it all out for. Someone like me. You only know what I only said… Go Ladies go!
___________________________________,
___________________________
Plaintiff
Edward Darren Achtem
